The fresh questionnaire contained 24 small signed-concluded and you will quick discover-ended issues, including background details. The previous concerns gathered information regarding experience regarding economic exchanges, frequency and you will quantity of schedules, demographic records, including, instance, gender, ages, and you may sexual orientation ( Dining table 1), reasons getting sugar dating ( Dining table 2), and you will event out of providing otherwise using escort functions. The vast majority of were looking for heterosexual arrangements, however the heterosexual taste are stronger one of many male respondents (97 %) than just among the feminine participants (61 %). Whilst age restriction to register on the website are 18, ten percent of your feminine claimed are younger than 18 (1417) (find Desk step 1, Contour step 1 and you may Profile 2). six The open-concluded questions addressed the latest meanings and you can motives around sugar relationships. This new interview together with questionnaire had been presented in the Swedish. Gunnarsson translated data become cited to the English.
Page Contents
Analysis
Both the interview in addition to questionnaire investigation was in fact examined qualitatively. Due to the fact interview research provided significantly more depth, brand new survey research provided depth. Specific proportions of the brand new questionnaire data were examined quantitatively, eg, age, gender, and you will sexual positioning. Interview transcriptions and you will qualitative survey responses have been processed from inside the NVivo because of a mixture of investigation-driven and you can design-driven programming. The trouble off simple tips to identify sugar matchmaking (particularly in regards to prostitution) and also the problem of crucial vs. intrinsic motives was indeed conceptually type in the coding processes. Analytical memo creating was utilized to file designs and fascinating themes through the programming and additionally a very alternative understanding of the material. In accordance with the observation your point depicted all kinds off techniques and you can event, i sought after a way of categorizing this type of distinctions. They turned obvious your experience did not vary collectively one to single axis, thus, unlike separating them towards you to number of categories (cf. Scull 2020), i chose to cardiovascular system the study three key size you to emerged as the most decisive organizers of differentiations: (1) The new standard content from glucose relationships arrangements: Precisely what do sugar daters create together? (2) The forms of settlement inside it: How try babies settled? and you will (3) Babies’ inspirational grounds for glucose matchmaking: As to the the amount manage it participate in the latest arrangement due to the materials masters or as they take pleasure in the actions when you look at the and you will out-of on their own? About pursuing the, new interview and you may survey investigation was examined together with respect to individuals types of sugar relationship per for every distinguishing aspect. If at all possible, amounts are offered regarding the volume of any group one of participants. Mention, even when, the numbers aren’t fundamentally affiliate of your wider inhabitants of glucose daters, and that participants often can not be nicely put into groups, as most keeps various various other event and the issues riding the information and knowledge age bracket weren’t designed to meets which article’s logical size.
Efficiency
The original aspect central to own differentiating anywhere between varieties of glucose relationships issues the new practical blogs of sugar dating arrangement. Brand new creating from glucose relationships shall be divided in to around three kinds. In the 1st category, we discover only sexual transaction; regarding the 2nd, babies and you can daddies is actually engaged in a more comprehensive relationship arrangement also sex but in addition to other activities; on 3rd, the brand new people socialize from inside the an online dating-such as for example trends, but sex is not area of the arrangement.
Sex Simply
1 / 2 of the baby interviewees (7 off 15) plus one daddy interviewee (step one off 9) equated glucose relationship often for the straightforward exchanging away from sex, or stated playing with sugar dating sites for this function, due to the fact best way of using this site or in general ways among others. From the survey answers, thirteen per cent of baby participants and you can 3 percent off daddy respondents unambiguously equated glucose relationship having prostitution or offering/to invest in sex. When inquired about advantages of sugar relationship as compared to other styles off relationship, you to survey respondent stated, It is really not a kind of dating [smiley]; your promote and purchase sex (child, 28). A recurrent motif throughout the issue is the fact glucose relationships is actually a glossy defense for prostitution, due to the fact articulated by the a different questionnaire respondent: This will be prostitution. The audience is towards the notice-deceit. Nobody of us really wants Quito hot girls to phone call our selves hooker otherwise john. So we altered the words and released it within the a nicer package (little one, 25). This crude awareness regarding the real characteristics of sugar dating contrasts for the focus away from previous lookup with the how glucose daters tend to delimit the things they’re doing of prostitution and you will sex functions ( Chu and you may Laidler 2016; Nayar 2017) and will become associated with Swedish mass media, where sugar relationship as the a cover getting prostitution has been a repeating motif ( Olsson 2019; Svenska Dagbladet 2017).