The the foregoing considerations promote credence into the contention one metaphor are a keen analogous label. This is certainly corroborated because of the St Thomas’ techniques in question 13 from the latest Prima Pars , just like the from inside the article three, as he requires if any name’s said securely from Goodness, the fresh new opposition lead toward play is actually between use proprie and you will improprie on the latter recognized having metaphor. Upcoming, within the post half college essay writer a dozen, as he asks when the labels preferred to help you Goodness and you will pets are very first told you of creatures, brand new distinction proprie/improprie is apparently a good subdivision of analogous name. St Thomas begins because of the stating that “when you look at the omnibus nominibus quae de- pluribus analogice dicuntur, necesse est quod omnia dicuntur for each respectum advertising unum: mais aussi ideo illud unum oportet quod ponatur within the definitione omnium. Ainsi que quia proportion quam significat nomen per prius dicitur de- eo quod ponitur from inside the definitione aliorum, ainsi que for each and every posterius de aliis, secundum ordinem quo appropinquant offer illud primum vel magis vel minus.” This is certainly exemplified because of the dated reputable, “suit.” “Sic hence omni nomina quae metaphorice de Deo dicuntur each prius de creaturis dicuntur quam de- Deo: quia dicta de Deo, nihil aliud high quam similitudines advertising tales creaturas.” St. Thomas observes the latest resemblance off ratio ( similitudo proportionum ) suggested for the “cheerful meadow” and in contacting God a beneficial lion.
As he goes on to speak regarding other labels “quae low metaphorice dicuntur de- Deo,” brand new obvious feeling is the fact he is talking of most other times out of analogous names than metaphors
Were there texts where St Thomas opposes metaphor and you can analogy? When we consider the newest comments toward Metaphysics , we find St Thomas identifying “potency” to your analogous and you may equivocal modes. “Potency” setting several things. “Sed ista multiplicitas quantum offer quosdam analogiae.” The equivocal modes from effectiveness are exemplified incidentally i talk about 3 with the 3rd electricity as well as the new cube once the power of your own range. “Mais aussi propter hoc for each and every quamdam similitudinem dicitur potens during the quadratum, sicut dicitur materia potens from inside the rem” Once again good proportionality notice. That these equivocal settings are indeed metaphors is obvious from the synchronous passing in-book Delta within the commenting on what St Thomas begins, “Ostendit quomodo potentia sumatur metaphorice.” What makes these modes metaphorical rather than analogical? “Their hence modis praetermissis, considerandum est de potentiis, quae reducuntur ad unam speciem, quia quaelibet earum est principium quoddam, ainsi que omnes potentiae sic dictae reducantur ad aliquid principium ex lover quo omnes aliae dicuntur.” In short, St Thomas here opposes metaphor so you’re able to analogous spends out-of a reputation because second and never the previous encompass a reduction to help you what’s generally denominated because of the keyword at issue whereas, will be they need pointing out, about text message of the Summa we thought a moment before, this new metaphor was not celebrated on extension proprie with this basis. Or is they the manner of your own regard to what is principally signifed by the identity hence differentiates metaphor off analogy, incorporate proprie regarding improprie ? Anything called metaphorically try, at all, brought to become just like what the label properly signifies.
What we would be wanting is a few technique for justifying brand new pretty popular huge difference off metaphor and you will analogy such that zero desire was created to Cajetan’s department away from example on attribution and you will right proportionality
An aporia has actually obviously emerged, thus, and its own resolution is only able to be had by choosing what good metaphor is actually and you can exactly what an enthusiastic analogous name’s. Remedies for this type of questions is always to enable us to see the frequently contradictory comments regarding Aquinas.